The United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) in Kirkuk visited a tree nursery run by the Kokar Foundation. Kokar is an Iraqi NGO, established by young people who are concerned about the environment. Director Ishmael is only 36 years old, but has grand ambitions: to plant and nurture 1 million trees! These trees will form a 'Green Belt' around Kirkuk to stop dust storms and mitigate the effects of climate change. The volunteers (whose numbers swell with every haboob) are well on their way: 70,000 trees have already been planted. UNAMI staff in Kirkuk also helped the cause and have committed to plant 100 trees on Tree Plant Day on 25 September 2022, bringing the grand total to 100,000 new trees in Kirkuk.   #OnlyOneEarth #WorldEnvironmentDay

Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq (ILO News) The International Labour Organization (ILO) and its training arm, the International Training Centre (ITCILO),  held workshops in Erbil for labour and social security inspectors and other relevant stakeholders aimed at strengthening their capacities in various aspects related to inspection.

The workshops targeted government officials working closely with the ILO under two different projects: Social Protection Programme for Iraq: Leveraging Effective Response and Accelerating Reform  and Enhancing labour governance, inspection and working conditions in response to COVID-19 , both of which are supported by the European Union.

In a series of tailored sessions, the trainings targeted heads of social security departments, social security inspectors and labour inspectors from across Iraq and the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Under the social protection programme, the ILO is supporting a newly establishment department of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs for social security inspectors. In doing so, the ILO undertook a training for heads of social security departments to enhance their understanding of how to build an effective labour inspection system and strengthen the institutional capacity of the social security departments. This included practical guidance using various ILO tools and examples of international good practices. The training focused on the roles and responsibilities of inspectors, as well as challenges and gaps social security inspectors face within the newly established department at the Ministry.

“The topics which were discussed represent the need to strengthen the inspection system in our Ministry,” said Ahmed Al-Turki, head of the social security inspection department in the Ministry of Labour and Social Affiars in Iraq. “We will continue to participate in the programme of ITCILO in the coming year, in efforts to strengthen the inspection system and build the capacities of inspectors.” “It has been a pleasure and honour to be part of the efforts aimed at strengthening social security inspection in Iraq,” said Olena Vazhynska, programme officer for social protection and labour inspection at ITCILO. “The training course conducted in Erbil not only contributed to reinforcing the knowledge of the Heads of Social Security Departments of the international framework for the realization of the right to social security but also responded to specific needs voiced by the participants in terms of examples of practical tools, experience sharing and best practices of the ILO strategic compliance model’s application.”

The training was followed by a capacity building workshop for social security inspectors in charge of monitoring compliance within labour and social security regulations. The workshop introduced participants to concepts and principles surrounding effective social security systems, current approaches of labour inspectorates in relation to social security matters, as well as compliance with legal obligations under national legislation and International Labour Standards.

“This workshop was beneficial in shedding light on modern inspection systems and labour standards related to inspection,” said Moustafa Mohammed Ali, social security inspector from Baghdad. Within the framework of the labour governance programme, the ILO held a Training of Trainers workshop for labour inspectors on its “Building Modern and Effective Labour Inspection Systems” training package. The package includes 17 modules covering a wide range of topics related to labour inspection; from principles and policies to practical tools and methods for visits.

The training equips national labour inspectorates with comprehensive training material that can be used as a tool in developing their own training curricula, adapted to specific contexts, strategies, priorities and needs.

This includes tools and knowledge that would allow them to apply key principles in the preparation, implementation, and follow-up of inspection visits; introduce ILO guidelines for inspection; design and evaluate training activities using learning and participatory approaches; and plan and deliver training sessions on the “Building Modern and Effective Labour Inspection Systems” modules.

“We have gained new knowledge through this workshop in relation to reporting, work-related injury and other skills related to inspection,” said Hasanain Abdul Wahed, a labour inspector at the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs and participant of the training.
  “This training provides technical content that is based on the training of the ILO material for labour inspectors and on teaching skills, so the idea is that they will be able to deliver training on technical content related to inspection to inspectors, including newly recruited ones,” said Felix Martin Daza, an official of ITCILO. “In addition to the course, our centre has created a platform in which this selected group of trainers can access adequate training material that can be used in the training of other inspectors. “

A key aspect of the training included an on-site study visit to a steels company, where participants were able to put their theoretical knowledge into practice. Labour inspectors observed the work site and provided feedback in relation to Occupational Safety and Health, working conditions, and other aspects related to the topics covered in the training.

The ILO has been building the capacities of these inspectors through a series a of trainings aimed at strengthening their role in the promotion and enforcement of labour regulations and procedures in Iraq.    

Today, the UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, Alice Wairimu Nderitu, and Danielle Bell, Chief of UNAMI’s Human Rights Office jointly facilitated a countering dialogue on hate speech, discrimination and marginalization.

The event brought together 19 representatives (five women and 14 men) from Armenian, Bahai, Faili Kurds, Jewish, Kaka’i, People of African Descent, Roma, Sabean Mandean, Shabak, Turkmen, Yazidi and Zorastrians communities and as well as civil society organizations, journalists, Iraqi High Commission for Human Rights, Iraq Bar Association and Communications and Media Commission.

UN Special Advisor Nderitu shared the United Nations global perspective of hate speech noting that “hate speech and incitement to hatred and violence create deep rooted divisions along ethnic and religious grounds which limit the space to build trust and mutual understanding.” She added, “It is essential to address the root causes of hate speech and not only its online and off-line manifestations.” For this, Special Adviser Nderitu reminded participants of Iraq’s responsibilities as State party to the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and encouraged all components of Iraq to work together support development and implementation of actions plans aimed at addressing hate speech so as to do it effectively.

“Human beings have immense capacity to find solutions even to problems they themselves create,” she concluded.

“Inclusive, results-oriented dialogue matched by commitment and concrete actions is fundamental to ending long-standing inequalities and discrimination in Iraq”, said Ms. Bell during her remarks.

During an open discussion session, the participants highlighted key issues facing Iraq, offered solutions and identified next steps to address these issues.


Photos: UNAMI PIO/Sarmad Al-Safy  

My briefing today will hit many all-too-familiar notes, as notorious aspects of Iraqi political life are repeating themselves in a seemingly incessant loop of zero-sum politics. But before delving into that, I would like to share some impressions on the recent and ongoing waves of massive dust- and sandstorms hitting Iraq. Now, while a dust- or sandstorm as such is not a new phenomenon for the country, the current wave far exceeds Iraq’s experiences in recent years. Briefing this Council last February, I spoke about the dangers of climate change and its effects, with desertification as a central concern. Ever since, Iraq has been battered by intense dust- and sandstorms that obscure the sky, send people running for shelter, even resulting in sickness and death. Now, these storms are only expected to become more frequent. In other words: continued inaction, also here, comes at enormous costs. Having said this, Mr. President, these storms are not the only concern for the people in Iraq. Iraqis continue to wait for a political class that, instead of being content with stale power battles, they are waiting for a political class that will roll up its sleeves to make headway on Iraq’s long list of outstanding domestic priorities. As you know, national elections took place well over seven months ago, and multiple deadlines for the formation of a government have been missed.  Now, it is true, Iraq is not the only country facing a protracted government formation process. But Iraq’s political leaders would do well not to hide behind that argument. It distracts from what is at stake. It excuses a political deadlock while non-state armed groups fire rockets with apparent freedom and impunity. It excuses a political stalemate while ordinary people suffer. It excuses a political impasse while simmering anger – public anger can boil over at any moments. So, my question is: what will it take to realize that this situation is completely untenable? To date, political leaders subscribe to the notion of dialogue, or another round of negotiations. But the necessary willingness to compromise? It is painfully absent. Visit any market and Iraqis will tell you: the national interest is, yet again, taking a backseat to short-sighted considerations of control over resources and power play. It is therefore high time (and yes, I repeat myself), but it is high time to return the spotlight where it must be: on the people of Iraq, and a programme of action that provides: Adequate service delivery to all citizens. An end to pervasive corruption, factionalism and the pillaging of state institutions. The implementation of desperately needed reforms. The diversification of the economy. Predictable governance instead of constant crisis management. An end to impunity, with accountability as a key feature of the State, and (of course) … Reining in non-state armed actors while asserting the State’s authority.   Over the past three years, you have heard me make these points numerous times. And one thing remains clear: the neglect of the population’s most basic needs has gone on for far too long. Again, Iraqi political inaction comes at a huge price. Not (in the short term) for those in power, but for those desperately trying to make ends meet on a daily basis. Mr. President, A few more specific observations, beginning with relations between Baghdad and Erbil. The sorry pattern of ad-hoc negotiations continues to prevail instead of what is critically needed: an institutionalized, predictable mechanism for the comprehensive, holistic and durable resolutions of all outstanding issues. While this is evidently necessary, such a mechanism continues to be plainly missing, and this deficiency is sadly coupled with internal rivalries on both sides as well. As I said last time: a spirit of partnership and cooperation can and must guide all stakeholders, including with regards to the recent Federal Supreme Court ruling on the KRG Oil and Gas Law. Having engaged with both sides on this matter, I am convinced that there is a way out. However, and there is no denying it: events in the past have gravely eroded mutual trust. Hence, it will prove essential to build confidence, including by pledging to refrain from politically motivated, unilateral actions in the future. Now, Mr. President, zooming in on the political situation within the Kurdistan Region: last year, in May, I participated in an event at the University of Kurdistan. It is a promising event with all Kurdistan Region political parties present. In my remarks, I outlined the toxicity of political infighting and factionalism. I emphasized the importance of unity, not to be confused with uniformity. I spoke candidly about the need to move away from the yellow & green divide, about the responsibility of leaders to guide outreach and to bring together opposing interests, to focus on solutions that represent the interests of all peoples living in the Kurdistan Region - be it Erbil, Dohuk or Sulaymaniyah. However, one year later, this promising event seems to have gained zero traction. On the contrary, divisions have deepened - with adverse effects on the peoples of the Kurdistan Region. Now, and without repeating my remarks of a year ago, but it must be clear: the Kurdistan Region has a choice. And with the Kurdistan Region elections scheduled for the 1st of October later this year, it is of utmost importance to level the electoral playing field - with all political actors, big or small, enjoying equal opportunities. Promoting a conducive electoral environment, that is. Additionally, I can only underline that geography does not always play in the Kurdistan Region’s advantage. In other words: its unique geopolitical circumstances alone, should be enough to give its leaders pause. And, of course, that goes for the whole of Iraq as well. As I have said on countless occasions: whether we like it or not, a weak domestic home front only creates a welcoming environment for continued external interference. Now, on a related note, let me also comment on incoming missiles and rockets: Disturbing, disruptive and dangerous. With the IRGC claiming responsibility for up to 12 short-range ballistic missiles launched in the early hours of Sunday March 13, another worrisome chapter was opened. And while the IRGC described the targeted location in Erbil as “the strategic centre for conspiracy and evil acts of the Zionists”, no evidence for such claims was found. The targeted site is known as a civilian area, a private compound. Although both sides – Iraq, Iran – although they are currently engaged in dialogue and do not wish to escalate the issue, Iraq rightfully rejects the notion that it can be treated as the region’s backyard, with routine violations of its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Now, another case in point are the ongoing Turkish and Iranian shelling activities in the North. So, what are we looking at? Cross-border shelling and missiles as the new normal for Iraq? This is a very risky way to advance interests, and one which further weakens the State of Iraq. Needless to say: any country or actor seeking to settle a dispute has established diplomatic instruments, including our good offices, at their disposal. Now, moving to Iraq’s very own armed actors operating outside state control: the reckless firing of rockets, including at an oil refinery in Erbil some two weeks ago, remains alarming and unjustifiable. These attacks seek to undermine Iraq’s security and stability within an already extremely volatile, politically charged post-electoral environment. Fact is: “messaging by rockets”, “missile diplomacy” – these are reckless acts, with potentially devastating consequences. Also, and let me emphasize, Iraq does not need self-proclaimed armed arbiters. And I again underline the great importance of asserting the State’s authority. If the perpetrators are known, call them out. This is essential to uphold the Rule of Law. Ladies and gentlemen, turning to the ever-pressing question of Sinjar: As we know all too well, Sinjar’s recent history has witnessed horrific ordeals, culminating in the heinous crimes committed by Da’esh. Today, while locals urgently need to rebuild their lives, they continue to face unconscionable obstacles. Obstacles due to discord on security arrangements, public service provisions and a unified administration. The Sinjar agreement, signed by Baghdad and Erbil in October 2020, was seen (by many) as a glimmer of hope: a very first but important step in the right direction. At the time, I expressed hope that the agreement would lead to a new chapter for Sinjar, one in which the needs of the Sinjari people would come first, that it would help displaced people return to their homes, that it would accelerate reconstruction and improve public service delivery. But for that to happen, stable governance and security structures are - of course - pre-requisites. Now, ever since the agreement was signed, I have called for a speedy implementation. Well clearly, the opposite is true. To date, there is no agreement on the selection of a new independent mayor, and funds for a new local security force remain blocked, possibly due to interference into unclear recruitment procedures. Now, on these recruitment procedures: I again emphasize the importance of pragmatism and realism. Not all people who joined “other forces” in the past can simply be painted with the same brush. It must be understood that some of them, absent the authority of the State, simply opted for a safety net, an identity and an income to provide for their families. We also called on both Baghdad and Erbil to reach out to the people of Sinjar, to open their arms to all Sinjaris. Meanwhile, critics of the Sinjar agreement kept on emphasizing the lack of consultations with local communities. Now, while no one dismisses good advice, and certainly not UNAMI, I have to say: local consultations did take place and continue to take place. At the same time, it is true that both Baghdad and Erbil could and should step up their outreach at the grassroots level. The implementation of any agreement, winning hearts and minds, is hard work. And this one in particular. A piece of paper alone will not do the job. One needs to be on top of it, 24/7, own it, constantly and proactively engage with the communities on the ground, provide explanations, clarify why a decision has been taken and why it benefits the Sinjaris in the medium to long term. Having said this: significant divides and the fragmentation of local communities are a fact of life in Sinjar, making things even more challenging. And within this context, it is also important to note that Sinjar has increasingly turned into an arena for external and domestic spoilers. Now, while some of this can be traced back to 2014 as Da’esh kicked off its atrocities, eight years later it is time to acknowledge that yes, mistakes have been made in the past, but Sinjar is part of the State of Iraq. By giving room to external and domestic spoilers, the situation will not get any better. And by now, all stakeholders would do well to acknowledge this fact - notwithstanding their gratitude for the help and assistance received in the past. You know, nobody said that the establishment of stable security and governance structures would be an easy ride. But there is no denying it: the lack of clear-cut coordination and implementation mechanism, the dominance of partisan interests and the ongoing presence of spoilers significantly hamper meaningful progress. I have to say – international observers have been deployed for less. Clashes have again erupted in recent weeks. And this sadly made Sinjari families again pack their belongings and find their way back to the Kurdistan Region to seek shelter. So, let me reiterate: Sinjaris’ safety and security should be front and centre at all times. They deserve peace under the authority of the State. Domestic and external spoilers have no place in Sinjar. Baghdad and Erbil must assume their responsibility, and urgently work together with only one objective: to improve the lives of people on the ground and promote the voluntary, dignified return of displaced persons to their homes. Mr. President, A few words on the issue of missing Kuwaiti and third-country nationals and missing Kuwaiti property, including the national archives. In recent months, the Iraqi Ministry of Defence has stepped up efforts to reach new witnesses through broadcasts, the media, as well as consular and diplomatic channels worldwide. As a result, at least two potential new witnesses have come forward during this period, confirming that broadcasts with a wide geographic reach can be helpful in eliciting information. This demonstrated that investing efforts in obtaining new witness information, and insisting on acquiring satellite imagery analysis from relevant member States, are essential steps to bring this crucial and sensitive file to a close. Now, Mr. President, I will conclude my remarks by underlining (once more) the importance of overcoming the political stalemate. Significant domestic vulnerabilities are being compounded by the ongoing effects of the pandemic and global geopolitical tensions. A sincere, collective and urgent will to resolve political differences must now prevail – it must prevail for the country to move forward and to meet the needs of its citizens. Thank you, Mr. President.